Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Wildman v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 183 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-11-12 No. 75-CC-108
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-108-Claimant awarded $1,105.88.) Award: $1,105.88 Agency: Office of the Attorney General
Cite as: Wildman v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 183 (1974)

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered under a contract, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON, Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; MARTIN A. SOLL, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.