Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

d/b/a Holiday Inn of Vandalia v. Illinois Department of Corrections

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-01-14 No. 75-CC-491
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-491-Claimant awarded $25.20.) Award: $25.20 Agency: Illinois Department of Corrections
Cite as: d/b/a Holiday Inn of Vandalia v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 (1975)
Lapsed Appropriation 30 awarded 1970s d/b/a Holiday Inn of Vandalia v. Illinois Department of Corrections 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 1975-01-14 (No. 75-CC-491-Claimant awarded $25.20.) /opinions/v30-p0292-1/

WAYNE F. SCHWAGER, d/b/a HOLIDAY INN OF VANDALIA, ILL., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for a contract claim after the appropriation lapsed and a warrant was not paid within one year. The court awarded $25.20 under the statute allowing replacement warrants.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Statutes cited: Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General, for Respondent.
  2. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, and if a warrant has not been paid after one year from date of issuance; persons who would be entitled under Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973, to request a replacement warrant may file an action in the Court of Claims for payment.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.