Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Alberto-Culver Company v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 364 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-03-03 No. 75-CC-451
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-451-Claimant awarded $5,226.95.) Award: $5,226.95
Cite as: Alberto-Culver Company v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 364 (1975)
General Court of Claims 30 awarded 1970s Alberto-Culver Company v. State of Illinois 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 364 1975-03-03 (No. 75-CC-451-Claimant awarded $5,226.95.) /opinions/v30-p0393-2/

ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment under the State Comptroller Act for a replacement warrant after the original warrant was not paid within one year. The Court of Claims awarded $5,226.95.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Statutes cited: Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill Rev Stat., 1973

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE COMPTROLLER ACT-replacement warrants. If the Comptroller re-

ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed March 3, 1975.

ROBERT L. APRATI, Assistant General Attorney, for Claimant.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

STATE COMPTROLLER ACT-replacement warrants. If the Comptroller refuses to draw and issue a replacement warrant; or if a warrant has not been paid after one year from date of issuance; persons who would be entitled under Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill Rev Stat., 1973, to request a replacement warrant may file an action in the Court of Claims for payment.

PER CURIAM. ________

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.