Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

M.s.p. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 516 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 16, 1975 No. 6937
Disposition: (No. 6937-Claimant awarded $13,933.06.) Award: $13,933.06 Agency: Illinois Department of Mental Health
Cite as: M.s.p. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 516 (1975)
Legacy General 30 awarded 1970s M.s.p. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 516 April 16, 1975 (No. 6937-Claimant awarded $13,933.06.) /opinions/v30-p0545-1/

M.S.P., INC., GENESIS GROUP, INC., Illinois Corporations, FRANK KAPPLE, and DAN VERNICH,Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought damages for breach of contract and tortious acts by agents of the Illinois Department of Mental Health. The parties stipulated to a net award of $13,933.06 after a credit, and the court entered judgment accordingly.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE-stipulation. Action in tort and contract against Department of Mental Health. Other litigation pending in Circuit Court concerning same subject. Stipulation as to amount of damages and dismissal of other suits accepted by Court.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Stipulation of the parties hereto, which reads as follows: “1. The instant cause, filed on October 16, 1972, is ’ based upon an alleged breach af contract by, and tortious acts of, agents and employees of the Illinois Department of Mental Health; 2. Prior to the filing of the instant cause, M.S.P., Inc., filed suit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, number 72 CH 336, against the respondent and various employees of respondent; respondent filed an action in the same forum, number 71 M1-155933, against the claimants; 3. The parties to the aforesaid action and suit agreed to mutually dismiss same with a credit due respondent from claimants in the amount of $4,066.94; 4. The parties hereby agree that respondent owes to claimants, and each of them, the cumulative gross amount of $18,000. (EIGHTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS) less the credit aforesaid, or a net amount of $13,933.06 [*517] (THIRTEEN THOUSAND, NINE H UNDRED AND THIRTYT HREE DOLLARS AND SIX CENTS); 5 . The parties further agree that this Court may enter an award in the amount of $13,933.06 (THIRTEEN THOUSAND, NINE H UNDRED AND THIRTY-THREE DOLLARS AND SIX CENTS) without further notice, no hearings or further pleadings being necessary for a determination herein; 6. The parties, and each of them, agree that the entry of an award in the aforementioned sum shall waive, release, relinquish and forever bar all claims or causes of action by and between the parties hereto, including any and all claims or causes of action that claimants, and each of them, has or may have against any officers, agents and/or employees of the Department of Mental Health from the beginning of time to the date of these presents; 7. The claimants and the Illinois Department of Mental Health expressly agree to perform all acts that may be necessary to effect dismissal of any claims pending against each other in any other court or proceeding.” and the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT Is H EREBY ORDERED that the sum of $13,933.06 (THIRTEEN THOUSAND, NINE H UNDRED AND THIRTYTHREE DOLLARS AND SIX CENTS) be awarded to claimants in full satisfaction of any and all claims or causes of actions that claimants, and each of them, has or may have against any officers, agents and/or employees of the Department of Mental Health, from the beginning of time to the date of these presents.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.