General Court of Claims 30 awarded 1970s Motorola v. Illinois Department of Corrections 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 582 1975-05-13 (No. 75-CC-693-Claimant awarded $723.20.) /opinions/v30-p0611-1/ **MOTOROLA, INC., Claimant, *vs.* STATE OF ILLINOIS,** **DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.**
Case summary
Claimant sought payment for a contract; the appropriation had lapsed, so the court awarded the amount due.
Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respond-
CONTRACTS-kZpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a
**MOTOROLA, INC., Claimant, pro se.** **WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J.** **KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respond-** **ent.** **CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation.** When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant. **PER CURIAM.**
**MOTOROLA, INC., Claimant, *vs.* STATE OF ILLINOIS,** **DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.** ***Opinion filed May 13, 1975.*** **MOTOROLA, INC., Claimant, pro se.** **WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J.** **KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respond-** **ent.** **CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation.** When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
**PER CURIAM.**
Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.