Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Multigraphics Division, Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 594 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-05-13 No. 75-CC-1007
Disposition: (No.75-CC-1007-Claimant awarded $2,089.56.) Award: $2,089.56 Agency: Illinois Department of Mental Health
Cite as: Multigraphics Division, Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 594 (1975)
General Court of Claims 30 awarded 1970s Multigraphics Division, Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 594 1975-05-13 (No.75-CC-1007-Claimant awarded $2,089.56.) /opinions/v30-p0623-1/

MULTIGRAPHICS DIVISION, ADDRESSOGRAPH-MULTIGRAPH CORP., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for goods or services from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MULTIGRAPHICS DIVISION, ADDRESSOGRAPH-MULTIGRAPH CORP., Claimant, pro se.
  2. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
  3. CONTRACTS-kZpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant.

ELAINE REVELL,INC., Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS,

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Respondent.

Opinion filed May 13, 1975.

ELAINE REVELL,INC., Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-k2pSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PER CURIAM.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.