Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Denson's Pharmaceutical Center v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 608 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1975-06-02 No. 75-CC-938
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-938 - Claimant awarded $5,551.10.) Award: $5,551.10
Cite as: Denson's Pharmaceutical Center v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 608 (1975)
General Court of Claims 30 awarded 1970s Denson's Pharmaceutical Center v. State of Illinois 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 608 1975-06-02 (No. 75-CC-938 - Claimant awarded $5,551.10.) /opinions/v30-p0637-2/

DENSON'SPHARMACEUTICAL CENTER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for a warrant that the Comptroller refused to replace after one year. The Court awarded $5,551.10 under the State Comptroller Act.

Claim type: Other

Statutes cited: Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respond- STATE COMPTROLLER ACT-replacement warrants. If the Comptroller re-

DENSON'S PHARMACEUTICAL CENTER, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed June 2, 1975.

DENSON'S PHARMACEUTICAL CENTER, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM J. KARAGANIS, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

STATE COMPTROLLER ACT-replacement warrants. If the Comptroller refuses to draw and issue a replacement warrant; or if a warrant has not been paid after one year from date of issuance; persons who would be entitled under Ch. 15, Sec. 210.10, Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973, to request a replacement warrant may file an action in the Court of Claims for payment.

PER CURIAM. ________

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.