Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

Arnold L. Sapp v. State of Illinois

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 675 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-09-26 No. 74-CV-63
Disposition: (No. 74-CV-63-Claimant awarded $861.75.) Award: $861.75
Cite as: Arnold L. Sapp v. State of Illinois, 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 675 (1974)
Crime Victim Compensation 30 awarded 1970s Arnold L. Sapp v. State of Illinois 30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 675 1974-09-26 (No. 74-CV-63-Claimant awarded $861.75.) /opinions/v30-p0704-1/

ARNOLD L. SAPP, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought funeral expenses for his daughter, a murder victim, under the Crime Victims Compensation Act. The court awarded $861.75 after deducting the statutory $200.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat., 1973, Ch. 70, Par. 71, et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat., 1973, Ch. 38, Par. 9-1 (a)(l); par. 77(d) of the Act

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-Where person is victim of violent crime as defined in the Act; has suffered pecuniary loss of $500 or more; notified and cooperated fully with law enforcement officials immediately after the crime; the victim and the assailant were not related and sharing the same household; the injury was not substantially attributable to the victims wrongful act or substantial provocation of the victim; and his claim was filed in the Court of Claims within 2 years of the date of injury, compensation is payable under the Act.

This claim arises from a murder which occurred on or about April 7, 1974, in Bureau County, Illinois. The claimant, Arnold Sapp, father of the deceased victim, Tracie Sapp, seeks remuneration for funeral expenses incurred as a result of the above-mentioned criminal act pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act” (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). Ill. Rev. Stat., 1973, Ch. 70, Par. 71, et seq., as amended.

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Court; and a report by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, which substantiates the matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court, the Court finds as follows:

1. The claimant herein is the father of a deceased victim of a compensible violent crime, to wit: murder specifically enumerated in paragraph 72 of the Act. (Murder; Ill. Rev. Stat., 1973, Ch. 38, Par. 9-1 (a)(l).

2. That the crime was promptly reported to the applicable law enforcement officials of Bureau County, Illinois.

3. That at all times claimant has fully cooperated with law enforcement officials in the investigation and prosecution of this incident, [*677]

4. That an alleged assailant has been apprehended by law enforcement officials and is awaiting trial in Bureau County, Illinois.

5 . Claimant, and claimant’s deceased daughter were not related to or members of the same household of the assailant.

6. There is no evidence that the injury to claimant’s deceased daughter was attributable to her wrongful act or her provocation.

7. Claimant seeks reasonable funeral expenses for their daughter of $1,061.75.

8. Claimant has received no other compensation as a result of these injuries.

9. Pursuant to par. 77(d) of the Act, the Court must deduct the first $200 of expenses.

10. That the proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of this Act, and the claim is therefore compensible thereunder.

IT Is H EREBY O RDERED THAT T HE SUM OF $861.75 (EIGHT H UNDRED SIXTY ONE DOLLARS A ND S EVENTY FIVE CENTS) be awarded Arnold Sapp for reasonable funeral expenses incurred in the criminal death of Tracie Sapp.

Official volume 30 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1974–June 30, 1975)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.