$10,000.00., IN RE APPLICATION OF SUSAN PETERSON. AND IN RE APPLICATION OF ERNEST AND EDNA PETERSON.
Case summary
Claimants sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for the death of Roy S. Peterson. The court awarded $10,000, allocating portions to the widow, parents for funeral expenses, and children of the victim.
Statutes cited: Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973, Ch. 70, Section 71, et seq.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION ACT-Distribukon of proceeds.
This claim arises out of a criminal offense that occurred on November 6, 1974, at 8121 South Racine Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. Claimants in these consolidated actions seek compensation pursuant to the provisions of the "Crime Victims Compensation Act," Ill.Rev.Stat., 1973, Ch. 70, Section 71, et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). [*719]
719 I
The sole contested issue presented to the Court is to determine the identities of those entitled to compensa
I
I tion under the Act.
The facts, other than those relating to the issue of those entitled to compensation, are undisputed. It appears that on November 6, 1974, Roy S. Peterson, the crime victim, was found shot to death at the Circle Chevrolet car lot, 8121 South Racine Avenue, Chicago,
I
Illinois. It appears that he leased guard dogs to Circle Chevrolet and was apparently making a security check on the lot when he was shot by a robber.
There is no evidence that the victim and his assailant were related or shared the same household.
Claimants have cooperated fully with law enforcement authorities to the best of their abilities.
As to the issue of who is entitled to benefits under the Act, it appears that Roy S. Peterson, the victim, ' married Karen D. Peterson on June 19, 1965. Two children were born of this marriage, namely, Lisa K. Peterson and Christian L. Peterson. This marriage was dissolved by divorce on April 12, 1969. This wife is remarried and her name is presently Karen D. Vitale.
On April 16, 1969, the victim was married to Marilyn A. Peterson. One child, namely Roy S. Peterson, Jr., was born of this marriage, This marriage was dissolved. by divorce on July 19, 1974. Marilyn A. Peterson has not remarried.
On September 19,1974, Roy S. Peterson was married to one Susan Gembara in Mexico. Susan Gembara received a Mexican divorce from her then husband on that same day. She was pregnant at the time of the marriage, and a son named Krjsti Roy Peterson was born to her on February 9,1975, aft&-the crime victim's death on November 6, 1974. A copy of the birth certificate of \ Kristi Roy Peterson was introduced into evidence. \ [*720] The victim’s father and mother, Ernest and Edna Peterson, paid the sum of $1,904.30 for the funeral of decedent. A claim for this amount is presented to the Court of Claims under the consolidated claim entitled, Ernest and Edna Peterson us. State of Illinois, No. 76-CV-504. A copy of the paid funeral bill was introduced into evidence.
From the evidence introduced at the hearing herein, the Court finds that the sum of $10,000, the maximum award allowable under the Act, should be entered in this cause.
The Court further finds that the Mexican divorce of the crime victim’s third wife and her subsequent marriage to the crime victim in Mexico were valid and , recognized under Illinois law. / / The Court further finds that the award herein should be allocated as follows: -’/ 5’ 1. To Ernest and Edna Peterson, parents of the crime victim, the sum of One /’ Thousand Nine Hundred Four and 30/100 ($1,904.30) Dollars, as reimbursement for the payment of the funeral bill for the deceased. 2. To Susan Peterson, the widow of the deceased, one-third (%) of the award herein, less the amount of the award to Ernest and Edna Peterson, and less attorney’s fees, as hereinafter set forth. 3. To Lisa Peterson, a minor, child of Karen Peterson Vitale (Wife NO. 11, one-fourth (W) of two-thirds (%) of the remaining sum of Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Seven and 14/100 ($5,397.14) Dollars, or One Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Nine and 281100 ($1,349.28) Dollars. 4. To Christian Peterson, a minor, child of Karen Peterson Vitale (Wife No. l), one-fourth ( W )of two-thirds (%) of the remaining sum of Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Seven and 14/100 ($5,397.14) Dollars, or One Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Nine and 28/100 ($1,349.28) Dollars. 5. To Roy S. Peterson, Jr., a minor, child of Marilyn A. Peterson (Wife No. 21, one-fourth (W)of two-thirds (%) of the remaining sum of Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Seven and 14/100 ($5,397.14) Dollars, or One Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Nine and 28/100 ($1,349.28) Dollars. 6. To Kristi Roy Peterson, a minor, child of Susan Peterson (Wife No. 3), one-fourth (%) of two-thirds (%) of the remaining sum of Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Seven and 14/%00($5,397.14) Dollars, or One Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Nine and 28/100 ($1,349.28)Dollars. , [*723] 3. That the Claimant’s alleged physical injuries of contracting influenza from the assailant and extraction of teeth six months after the crime because of nervousness are remote and speculative. Therefore, no compensation can be awarded for the losses under the Act. 4. That loss of personal effects is not compensable under the Act and therefore no compensation can be awarded for the Claimant’s loss of her purse and its contents. 5. That the Claimant has no loss which is compensable under’the Act.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no award be made to the Claimant because she has suffered no loss which is compensable under the Crime Victims Compensation Act.