Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Giffin v. State of Illinois

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 Illinois Court of Claims Filed December 26, 1978 No. 73-CC-0449
Disposition: (No. 73-CC-0449-Claimant awarded $2,071.49.) Award: $2,071.49
Cite as: Giffin v. State of Illinois, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 (1978)
General Court of Claims 32 awarded 1970s Giffin v. State of Illinois 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 December 26, 1978 (No. 73-CC-0449-Claimant awarded $2,071.49.) /opinions/v32-p0616-1/

GIFFIN, WINNING, LINDNER, NEWKIRK & COHEN, a Partner- ship, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. GIFFIN, WINNING, LINDNER, NEWKIRK & COHEN, a Partner-

GIFFIN, WINNING, LINDNER, NEWKIRK & COHEN, a Partnership, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Order filed December 26, 1978.

The Claimant filed a claim for services rendered to the director of the Department of Finances of Illinois.

Said claim being in the amount of $2,071.49; $1,840.00 for services rendered and $231.49 for advancement in said cause by Claimant.

[*510] The only amount that appears to be in dispute between the parties hereto, seems to be the $100.00. The Respondent points out that a distinction should be made between services rendered in litigation and services rendered as an aid or advisor. The evidence in this case shows that the charge for litigation was $100.00.

The objection made by the Respondent in said amount is correct and award is hereby entered in the amount of $2,071.49; $1,840.00 for Claimant’s bill for services rendered as an aid or advisor; and $231.49 monies advanced the Claimant on behalf of the Department of Finance.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.