Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

First Judicial Circuit v. >

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 618 Illinois Court of Claims Filed January 29, 1979 No. 76-CC-0856
Disposition: (No. 76-CC-0856-Claim dismissed.)
Cite as: First Judicial Circuit v. >, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 618 (1979)
General Court of Claims 32 dismissed 1970s First Judicial Circuit v. > 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 618 January 29, 1979 (No. 76-CC-0856-Claim dismissed.) /opinions/v32-p0725-1/

First JUDICIAL Circuit, Claimant, v. STATE oF ILLINOIS Respondent. >

Headnotes

  1. APPROPRIATIONS-Insufficient appropriations.

This matter comes before the Court on Respondent’s motion to dismiss.

This claim was filed by the County Treasurer, Union County Court House, Jonesboro, Illinois, and was based upon salaries allegedly due the various [*619] probation officers in the First Circuit Court District of the State of Illinois.

Section 6-7 of the “Juvenile Court Act’’ (Ill. Rev.

Stats., Ch. 37, para. 706-7, 1975) provides for reimbursement to counties for compensation paid by the counties to probation officers.

Under Section 2 of House Bill 2909 (Public Act 78-1287) $2,000,000.00 was appropriated during Fiscal Year 1975 for such reimbursements to counties, with said appropriation being assigned line item No. 001- 36020-4453-0000. That appropriation was insufficient to make full reimbursement to all the counties concerned.

The office of the Comptroller honored each request for payment on the basis of first in first out, and asa result, the appropriation was depleted leaving some counties unpaid.

The Comptroller then prepared and submitted a bill for a supplemental appropriation which failed passage; therefore, there were no funds with which to pay the claim in question.

Motion to dismiss is hereby granted and said cause is dismissed.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.