Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Werner F. Roupp v. State of Illinois

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 660 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 2, 1978 No. 77-CC-0808
Disposition: (No. 77-CC-0808-Claimant awarded $387.45.) Award: $387.45
Cite as: Werner F. Roupp v. State of Illinois, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 660 (1978)
General Court of Claims 32 awarded 1970s Werner F. Roupp v. State of Illinois 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 660 November 2, 1978 (No. 77-CC-0808-Claimant awarded $387.45.) /opinions/v32-p0767-1/

WERNER F. Roupp, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost whilein the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

The record herein establishes without contradiction that on March 2, 1977, a Sony portable color television set, costing $387.45 was delivered to Stateville Correctional Center by Polk Brothers of Joliet, Illinois, for delivery to Claimant. The television set was received by one Sgt. Adams at the gate of the institution, but disappeared before it was delivered to Claimant.

Respondent has conceded liability for the loss of the set.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $387.45.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.