Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Lance Bell v. Iluinors

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 664 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 11, 1978 No. 77-CC-1018
Disposition: (No. 77-CC-1018-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Lance Bell v. Iluinors, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 664 (1978)
General Court of Claims 32 denied 1970s Lance Bell v. Iluinors 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 664 September 11, 1978 (No. 77-CC-1018-Claim denied.) /opinions/v32-p0771-1/

LANCE BELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILuINors, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to excercise

LANCE BELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILuINors, Respondent.

Opinion filed September 11, 1978.

PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to excercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property whenit takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

FOLos,. Ce); Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property. ; However, upon examination of the record in this cause, we find that Claimant’s property was lost during the course of a shake down conducted by an employee of the Illinois Department of Corrections in search of contraband.

This was not an instance where the State took actual physical possession of Claimant’s property, and this Court does not recognize a right to recovery under these circumstances. See, Bargas v. State, 32 Ill. Ct.

Glass

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, denied.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.