Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Evelyn Cole v. Illinoi!s

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 770 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 29, 1978 No. 78-CC-0648
Disposition: (No. 78-CC-0648-Claimant awarded $24.00.) Award: $24.00
Cite as: Evelyn Cole v. Illinoi!s, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 770 (1978)
General Court of Claims 32 awarded 1970s Evelyn Cole v. Illinoi!s 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 770 September 29, 1978 (No. 78-CC-0648-Claimant awarded $24.00.) /opinions/v32-p0879-1/

EVELYN COLE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINoI!s, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. STIPULATED SETTLEMENTS- Overpayment of vehicle license fee.

This matter comes before the Court on a stipulation by Respondent which states as follows:

“1. That the complaint herein originally sought $144.00 in license fee overpayments.

2. That pursuant to an order of the Court dated August 3, 1978, the allowable recovery on this claim was reduced to $24.00.

3. That according to the report submitted by the Illinois Secretary of State, dated May 10, 1978, Claimant in fact made overpayments of her license fee.

4. That under III. Rev. Stat., Ch. 95 1/2, Sec. 3-824 (6), 1977, the Secretary of State is authorized to make refunds of overpayments made within six months prior to a refund application.

[*771] G11

5. That the $24.00 cannot be directly refunded by the Secretary of State in that the amounts were paid by Claimant one and two years ($12.00 each year) before she requested a refund.

6. That under III. Rev. Stat., Ch. 95 1/2 Sec. 3-824 (d), 1977, the Claimant must apply to the Court of Claims for this refund.

7. That there being no disputed questions of fact, Respondent agrees to an entry of an award of $24.00.

There being no matters under dispute, an award is hereby entered in the amount of $24.00.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.