Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Charles Conti

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1092 Illinois Court of Claims Filed October 23, 1978 No. 76-CV-1277
Disposition: (No. 76-CV-1277 - Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Charles Conti, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1092 (1978)
Crime Victim Compensation 32 denied 1970s In re Charles Conti 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1092 October 23, 1978 (No. 76-CV-1277 - Claim denied.) /opinions/v32-p1197-1/

IN RE APPLICATION OF CHARLES CONTI

Headnotes

  1. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION AcT - Failure to cooperate with law enforcement officials.

This claim arises out of a criminal offense that occurred on October 11, 1975, in the 2600 block of North Southport Ave., Chicago, Illinois. The Claimant seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” hereafter referred to as the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70., Sec. 71, et seq.).

Based on the investigatory report of the Attorney General the claim was denied on January 31, 1978, on the ground that the Claimant did notincur a pecuniary loss of $200.00 or more atributable to a violent crime.

a Ee [*1093] The Claimant objected to this order and requested a full hearing on the merits. This claim was assigned toa Commissioner and a hearing was held on August 9, 1978, before Commissioner Leo J. Spivack where the following facts were established by a preponderance of the evidence:

The Claimant, Charles Conti, was the victim of a violent crime as defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act to wit: Aggravated Battery (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, Sec. 12-4).

As the result of being beaten and robbed on October 11, 1975, the Claimant incurred medical and hospital expenses in the treatment of his broken jaw and head injuries. He seeks compensation for only these expenses. He suffered no loss of income because he had been unemployed for over six months prior to the offense.

On or about December 6, 1975, Detective Ley called Claimant to set up an interview date but was told that Claimant, on advice of counsel, was to make no statement or give any information.

(c) On or about December 6, 1975, Sargent James Tellme, in charge of the homocide investigation, detailed officers to interview Claimant. Such interview was never had, due to the officers inability to contact Claimant.

3. Claimant has not cooperated fully with the authorities in and about the investigation of the crime and the apprehension of those responsible, as is required by the letter of the statute.

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds no reason to modify its order of July 10, 1978.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.