Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Ruby Gale Stevens

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 5, 1978 No. 77-CV-0077
Disposition: (No. 77-CV-0077 - Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Ruby Gale Stevens, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095 (1978)
Crime Victim Compensation 32 denied 1970s In re Ruby Gale Stevens 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095 September 5, 1978 (No. 77-CV-0077 - Claim denied.) /opinions/v32-p1200-1/

In RE APPLICATION OF RuBY GALE STEVENS

Headnotes

  1. WituraM J. Scort, Attorney General for Tilinois; GrorcE M. ScHAFER, Assistant Attorney General.
  2. CRIME VicTtIMS COMPENSATION ACT - Wrongful act or substantial provocation. Where Claimant’s decedent was engaged in hitchhiking and died as a result of a gunshot wound inflicted by assailant as he was leaving assailant’s automobile, his death was substantially attributable to his wrongful act.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on June 23, 1976. Ruby Gale Stevens, mother of the deceased victim, seeks compensation pursuant to the ee provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” PE hereafter referred to as the Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70, | Re §71, et seq.).

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Court, and a report of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court, the Court finds:

1. That the Claimant’s deceased son, Stephen Eric Skibba, age 16, was allegedly a victim of a crime of violence, as set forth in sec. 2(c) of the Act, to wit: Murder (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, §9-1).

[*1096] 2. That on June 23, 1976, Claimant’s son was shot by James R. Michels as he was attempting to leave the assailant’s automobile after the victim had accepted a ride while hitch-hiking.

3. That sec. 3(f) of the Act provides that a person is entitled to compensation under the Act if the injury to or death of the victim was not substantially attributable to the victim’s wrongful act.

4. That it appears from the investigatory report and police report that the victim’s death was attributableto his wrongful act of hitch-hiking in violation of II].

Rev. Stat., Ch. 95.5, sec. 11-1006.

5. That the Claimant’s claim does not meet a required condition precedent for the right to compensation under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that the claim of Ruby Gale Stevens be, and is hereby denied.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.