Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

In re Katherine Farmer

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 335 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-02-04 No. 00172
Disposition: (No. 00172-Claim dismissed.)
Cite as: In re Katherine Farmer, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 335 (1980)
Legacy General 33 dismissed 1980s In re Katherine Farmer 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 335 1980-02-04 (No. 00172-Claim dismissed.) /opinions/v33-p0411-1/

In re Application of KATHERINE FARMER.

Case summary

Claimant sought death benefits under the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act for the death of a law enforcement officer or firefighter. The court dismissed the claim because it was filed more than one year after the deceased's death, beyond the statutory filing period.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FIREMEN COMPENSATION ACT-claim

In re Application of KATHERINE FARMER.

Order filed February 4,1980.

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FIREMEN COMPENSATION ACT-claim dismissed-untimely filing. The claim for death benefits under the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act filed more than one year after the deceased’s death was dismissed since the claim was filed within the one-year period provided by the Act.

HOLDERMAN, J .

This cause coming on to be heard on respondent’s motion to dismiss the instant cause, and, it appearing to the court that claimant has received due notice of said motion, and this court being fully advised in the premises;

It being determined that claimant has failed to file her claim within the time period limited by law;

It is hereby ordered that the motion of respondent be, and the same is, hereby granted and the instant cause is herewith dismissed with prejudice.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.