Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Application of Gerardo Courtade

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 404 Illinois Court of Claims Filed Unknown No. 76-CV-0173
Disposition: (No. 76-CV-0173-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Application of Gerardo Courtade, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 404
Crime Victim Compensation 33 denied In re Application of Gerardo Courtade 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 404 Unknown (No. 76-CV-0173-Claim denied.) /opinions/v33-p0480-1/

In re APPLICATION OF GERARDO COURTADE. Affirmed on rehearing March 20,1980.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for injuries from an aggravated battery. The court denied the claim because the victim did not report the crime to police within a reasonably practicable time, violating section 3(c) of the Act.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 12-4

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General (JERRY FELSENTHAL, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Responden t.
  2. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-failure to cooperate with law enforcement officials. Where Claimant did not report alleged crime until nearly forty-three hours after occurrence, claim was denied.

This claim arises out of a criminal offense that occurred on 3035 West Irving Park Road, in Chicago, Illinois. Gerardo Courtade, victim, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the Act.)

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Court; and a report of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court, the Court finds:

1. That the Claimant, Gerardo Courtade, age 43, was a victim of a violent crime, as defined in section 2 ( c ) of the Act, to wit: “Aggravated Battery.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 12-4.

2. That on May 11, 1975, at about 12:30 a.m., the Claimant was walking at 3035 West Irving Park Road, in Chicago, Illinois, when two still unidentified youths stopped him and demanded money to buy pot. When the Claimant refused, the youths attacked him, one hitting him in the face with a bottle of soda pop. After a fight, the youths fled. The Claimant then went home but did not notify the police. On May 12, 1975, Claimant went to work, and, after work, saw his dentist, Dr. Pedro Cabrera, who advised him to go to the hospital. Claimant arrived at Forkosh Memorial Hospital in Chicago, Illinois,

at 7:30 p.m., where the nurse on duty notified the police.

[*406] Claimant was found to have a fractured jaw. No identification or arrests have been made in this matter.

A further and more detailed summary of the facts and information considered by the Court is contained in the investigatory report prepared by the Attorney General. A copy of said report is retained in the Court’s file in this matter and the facts reported therein are incorporated in this opinion by reference.

3. That statements, taken by the police investigators shortly after the crime was committed, present no evidence that the Claimant’s injuries were in any way attributable to his wrongful act or the substantial provocation of his assailant.

4. That the victim and his assailant were not related nor sharing the same household.

5. That the Claimant in this case incurred hospital and medical expenses and suffered a loss of earnings. However the attack upon Claimant was not reported to the police until nearly 43 hours after it occurred. This is a violation of section 3(c) of the Act which requires that the appropriate law enforcement officials be: “ O O notified of the perpetration of the crime allegedly causing the O O injury to the victim as soon after its perpetration as was reasonably practicable under the circumstances.”

Therefore, this claim must be denied since Claimant did not act in compliance with section 3(c) of the Act.

Wherefore, it is hereby ordered that the claim of Gerard0 Courtade be denied.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.