Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Dennis R. King

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 450 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-04-08 No. 80-CV-0064
Disposition: (No. 80-CV-0064-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Dennis R. King, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 450 (1980)
Crime Victim Compensation 33 denied 1980s In re Dennis R. King 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 450 1980-04-08 (No. 80-CV-0064-Claim denied.) /opinions/v33-p0526-1/

In re APPLICATION OF DENNIS R. KING.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for injuries from a shooting. The court denied the claim because the injury was substantially attributable to the claimant's provocation of the assailant.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 12-3

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General (WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. C RIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am- wrongful act or substantial provocution.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on March 12, 1979, in Danville, Illinois. Dennis R. King, victim, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et se9.

[*451] This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds:

1. That the Claimant, Dennis R. King, age 22, was a victim of a violent crime as defined in section 2(c) of the Act, to wit: Aggravated Battery. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 12-3.

2. That on March 12, 1979, Claimant was shot in the groin by a subject with whom he had been fighting. Claimant was at a private club and had re-entered the club after being asked to leave.

3. That section 3(b) of the Act provides that a person is entitled to compensation under the Act if the injury to or the death of the victim was not substantially attributable to the victim’s wrongful act or substantial provocation of the assailant.

4.That it appears from the investigatory report and the police report that the Claimant’s injury was attributable to his substantial provocation of the assailant.

5. That the Claimant has not met a required condition precedent for compensation under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that the Claim of Dennis R. King be, and is hereby denied.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.