Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Vito and Hattie Brando

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-05-29 No. 80-CV-0272
Disposition: (No. 80-CV-0272-Claim denied.)
Cite as: In re Vito and Hattie Brando, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 (1980)
Crime Victim Compensation 33 denied 1980s In re Vito and Hattie Brando 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 1980-05-29 (No. 80-CV-0272-Claim denied.) /opinions/v33-p0532-1/

In re APPLICATION OF VITO AND HATTIE BRANDO.

Case summary

The claimants sought compensation under the Crime Victims Compensation Act for the death of their son. The court denied the claim because the victim's death was substantially attributable to his own wrongful act of aiming a gun at the assailant.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General (ALAN R. BouDREAU, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Re‘ spondent.
  2. C RIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am- wrongful act or substantial provocation.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on September 3, 1979. Vito and Hattie Brando, parents of the deceased victim, George Edward Brando, seek compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Vic[*457]tims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act.

Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 et se9.

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds: 1.That on September 3,1979, the victim was shot by Mr. Nathan Landfair, who was known to him. The incident occurred when the victim was visiting Mr. Landfair at his residence located at 9129 S. Colfax, Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Landfair saw that the victim had a gun and asked him to leave. When he didn’t leave, Mr. Landfair got his own gun and fired a warning shot. The victim then aimed his gun at Mr. Landfair, and Mr. Landfair shot him. The victim was dead on arrival at South Chicago Hospital. No charges were placed against Mr.

Landfair. 2. That section 3(f)of the Act states that a person is entitled to compensation under the Act if the injury to or the death of the victim was not substantially attributable to the victim’s wrongful act or substantial provocation of the assailant. 3. That it appears from the investigatory report and the police report that the victim’s death was substantially attributable to his producing a gun and aiming it at Mr.

Landfair before Mr. Landfair shot him. 4.That the Claimant has not met a required condition precedent for compensation under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that this claim be, and is hereby denied.

Official volume 33 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1980 – July 1, 1979–June 30, 1980)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.