CYRENIAICA MOORE, Claimant, v . THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought reissuance of an unemployment check that was fraudulently cashed by her husband. The court dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction to review the Department of Labor's administrative decision.
Cases cited: Anaya v. State, 78-CC-1279
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CYRENIAICA
- P RACTICE AN D PROCEDURE-COUT~ of Claims lacks jurisdiction to review decision of Department of Labor on reissuance of unemployment check. The claim based on the decision of the Department of Labor not to reissue an unemployment check which had been fraudulently cashed by the Claimant’s husband was dismissed as the Court of Claims lacks jurisdiction to review the decision of the Department of Labor not to reissue such a check.
This matter coming on to be heard upon the motion of Respondent to dismiss the claim herein, and, it appearing to the court that Claimant has received due notice of said motion, and, the court being fully advised in the premises;
Finds that pursuant to Rule 14 of the Court of Claims the Departmental report issued by the Illinois Department of Labor, Bureau of Employment Security is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.
Finds: That the departmental report establishes that on June 28, 1977, a hearing was conducted by the department and that the hearing determined that the State warrant in question was fraudulently cashed by Claimant’s husband and should not be issued.
That in Anaya v. State, 78-CC-1279, this Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to review an administrative decision of the Department of Labor regarding the reissuance of an unemployment check.
It is hereby ordered:
That the motion of Respondent be and the same is hereby granted and the claim herein be and is hereby dismissed.