Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Marshall Davis v. State of Illinois

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 123 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1980-10-01 No. 78-CC-0138
Disposition: (No. 78-CC-0138-Claimant awarded $5,000.00.) Award: $5,000.00
Cite as: Marshall Davis v. State of Illinois, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 123 (1980)

MARSHALL DAVIS, Claimant, v . THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $100,000 for injuries and property damage from an accident on February 1, 1977. The court awarded $5,000 as a full settlement based on the parties' stipulation to dismiss.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PRACrICE AND PROCEDURE - C h T l granted pursuant t o StipUhfiOn. The claim arising from an accident was agreed to be settled by stipulation of the parties as to the amount to be paid in full settlement of all claims presented.

ARTHUR L. POLLMAN and GEORGE MRUGES, for Claimant.

HOLDERMAN, J.

This claim coming on to be heard pursuant to the stipulation to dismiss of the parties hereto, and the court being fully advised in the premises; The court finds: That this claim is based on an accident on February 1, 1977, wherein Claimant alleges damages totaling $100,000.00 as and for injuries and property damage.

That the Claimant has agreed to accept the sum of $5,000.00 as and for a full, complete and final settlement of all claims against Respondent, State of Illinois.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $5,000.00 (five thousand dollars and no cents) be and is hereby awarded to Claimant, Marshall G. Davis in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois in the above captioned cause.

Official volume 34 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1981 – July 1, 1980–June 30, 1981)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.