Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Elaine Peltz et al. v. State of Illinois

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1981-05-06 No. 81-CC-1475
Disposition: (No. 81-CC-1475-Claimant awarded $522,863.83.) Award: $522,863.83 Agency: Illinois Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Elaine Peltz et al. v. State of Illinois, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 (1981)
General Court of Claims 34 awarded 1980s Elaine Peltz et al. v. State of Illinois 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 1981-05-06 (No. 81-CC-1475-Claimant awarded $522,863.83.) /opinions/v34-p0384-1/

ELAINE PELTZ et al., Claimants, 2). THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought individual judgments for unpaid benefits under the AABD Program between 1968 and 1971. The court awarded the aggregate amount of $522,863.83 based on a stipulation arising from settlement of federal litigation, to be paid from the Federal Public Aid Trust Fund.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 23, par. 3-1 et seq.

Cases cited: Jordan v. Quern, 70 C 10

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. T YRONE C. F AHNER, Attorney General (S ANDRA L. ANDINA, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. APPROPRIAT1ONS-fUndS appropriated by the Department of Public Aid for benefits lapsed. An award was granted for benefits under the Department of Public Aid’s Aid to the Aged, Blind and Disabled program, where the funds appropriated to the Department of Public Aid had lapsed for the period during which the debts were incurred.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Stipulation by Respondent and the Court being fully advised in the premises; that 3,811 Claimants seek individual judgments in specified amounts as listed in exhibit “A” to their complaint; that such judgments, in the aggregate amount of $522,863.83, consist of benefits for which they applied, but did not receive, under the Illinois Department of Public Aid’s Aid to the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (AABD) Program between July 1, 1968 and April 16, 1971; that this stipulation arises out of settlement of U.S. District Court litigation entitled Jordan 0.Quern, 70 C 10 and that authorization for this expenditure can be found in Article I11 of the Public Aid Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 23, par. 3-1 et seq.).

An investigation of this claim by the Illinois Department of Public Aid, hereinafter referred to as the Department determined that United States Government funds were made available to the State of Illinois for this expenditure and deposited in the State Treasury in the Federal Public Aid Trust Fund.

The amount due would have been paid in the regular course of business had the claim been presented to the proper office at the appropriate time.

The sole reason said claim was not previously paid is due to the fact that upon the lapse of the State Funds appropriated to the Department, for the period during which the debt was incurred, said Department refused to expend the Federal funds out of which this claim would normally have been paid, the same having been con[*286]firmed by the written report of the Department, a copy of said report being attached to the stipulation by Respondent.

It is therefore ordered that Claimants, Elaine Peltz, et al., be and are hereby awarded the sums specified in exhibit “A” of their complaint, in an aggregate amount of $522,863.83 (five hundred, twenty-two thousand, eight hundred sixty-three dollars and eight-three cents) to be appropriated out of and paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Federal Public Aid Trust Fund.

Official volume 34 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1981 – July 1, 1980–June 30, 1981)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.