Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1982-02-11 No. 80-CC-1691
Disposition: (No. 80-CC-1691-Claimant awarded $203.61.) Award: $203.61 Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Cite as: Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 (1982)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 1982-02-11 (No. 80-CC-1691-Claimant awarded $203.61.) /opinions/v35-p0469-1/

XEROX CORPORATION, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Xerox Corporation claimed payment for services or goods provided to the Department of Children and Family Services. The court denied the State's petition to reopen the record and awarded $203.61 to the claimant due to the State's delay in providing a departmental report.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. T YRONE C. FAHNER, Attorney General (KATHLEEN O’BRIEN,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. P RACTICE AND PRocEDuRE-petition to reopen record denied. State’s petition to reopen record to introduce departmental report concerning claim denied as matter had been continued for nearly two years to allow introduction of report which was never produced.

This matter coming on to be heard upon the petition of Respondent to reopen the record herein, and it appearing to the Court that Claimant has received due notice of this petition, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

The record in this matter indicates that this claim was filed on March 27, 1980. The Attorney General requested a departmental report from the Department of Children and Family Services approximately two weeks later. Sixty days having passed, the claim was assigned to a commissioner who set a hearing date nearly five months in advance. The case was then continued until March 3, 1981, at which time the commissioner indicated it was to finally be disposed of. However, it was continued again until June 24, 1981, well over a year after the claim was filed.

Present at the June 24, 1981, hearing were two assistant attorneys general and Claimant’s lawyer and the commissioner. A departmental report was still unavailable. The commissioner filed his recommendation anyway.

[*313] Nearly one month after the last scheduled hearing, Respondent filed the petition to reopen the record to introduce the departmental report which was alleged to have been received approximately two weeks after the last hearing. Said petition states at item No. 4 that the departmental report is attached to the petition. However, neither the Court nor the clerk’s office has ever received it. It is now going on two years since this claim was filed.

It is hereby ordered that the petition of Respondent be, and hereby is, denied and Claimant is awarded the sum of $203.61 in full satisfaction of this claim.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.