Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Iola Quarry v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 393 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1982-02-19 No. 82CC-1569
Disposition: (No. 82CC-1569-Claimant awarded $5,178.58.) Award: $5,178.58 Agency: Capital Development Board
Cite as: Iola Quarry v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 393 (1982)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Iola Quarry v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 393 1982-02-19 (No. 82CC-1569-Claimant awarded $5,178.58.) /opinions/v35-p0550-1/

IOLA QUARRY, INC., Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant, a subcontractor, sought payment for crushed stone furnished to a general contractor on a state project. The court found the Capital Development Board liable for failing to honor a properly filed mechanics' lien and awarded the claimant $5,178.58.

Claim type: Contract

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 82, par. 24

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TYRONE C. F AHNER, Attorney General (WILLIAM WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent .
  2. CoNTRAcTs-general contractor paid b y State in violation o f subcontractor’s lien-claim allowed. The claim of a subcontractor for stone furnished to the general contractor on a State job was allowed, as State paid general contractor the balance due for stone without regard to subcontractor’svalid mechanic’s lien.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Respondent’s stipulation and the Court being fully advised in the premises finds that this is a claim for crushed stone furnished by Iola Quarry, Inc., subcontractor, to the general contractor, Ron Golder, at a cost of $5,178.58.As stipulated by the parties, the Claimant, subcontractor, did file with the Capital Development Board a lien in accordance with the provisions of section 24 of the Mechanics’ Liens Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 82, par. 24) in order to protect its interest. The only way in which a subcontractor may protect its interest as against the owner of a construction project, in the State of Illinois, is through the Mechanics’ Liens Act. In spite of the fact that the lien was properly filed with the Capital Development Board, the general contractor was subsequently paid all of the balance due him without regard to the lien.

Having failed to honor a properly filed lien, the Capital Development Board is liable to the subcontractor for the amount of its lien.

In view of the Capital Development Board’s failure [*394] to recognize a valid lien, it is the order of this Court that the Claimant be granted an award as claimed in the amount of $5,178.58.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.