Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Robert Stein v. State of Illinois

36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 134 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1983-07-01 No. 79-CC-0723
Disposition: (No. 79-CC-0723-Claimant awarded $6,000.00.) Award: $6,000.00
Cite as: Robert Stein v. State of Illinois, 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 134 (1983)
General Court of Claims 36 awarded 1980s Robert Stein v. State of Illinois 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 134 1983-07-01 (No. 79-CC-0723-Claimant awarded $6,000.00.) /opinions/v36-p0219-1/

ROBERT STEIN, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant was injured when his bicycle struck water-filled holes in broken pavement on a state highway. The court awarded $6,000 based on a joint stipulation, finding the State had actual knowledge of the defect for at least six months.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Thien v. City of Belleville, 331 Ill. App. 337; Di Orio v. State (1950), 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 53; Kamin v. State (1953), 21 Ill. Ct. Cl. 467

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

ROBERT STEIN, Claimant, 0. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

Respondent.

Opinion filed July 1 , 1983.

STEINBERG & B URTKER, LTD., for Claimant.

NEIL HARTIGAN, Attorney General (FRANCIS DONOVAN, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

HicHwAYs-water-filled, holes in pavement-fall from hicycle-sfipulation-award granted. Based on the joint stipulation of the parties, an award \vas granted’korthe broken elbow sustained when Claimant’sbicycle struck a series of water-filled holes in the broken pavement of a State highway, as record sustained finding that State had actual knowledge of 4efective pavement in question for at least six months prior to the accident.

HOLDERMA,N,

J.

This is an action to recover for personal injury sustained by Claimant, Robert Stein, on June 8, 1978, when the bicycle upon which he was riding struck an area of broken and defective pavement filled with water on the west side of Route 41 just south of West Park Avenue in Highland Park, Illinois. Claimant contended that the State was negligent in maintaining the area in question and had actual knowledge of the defect for a period of between six months to one year prior to June 8, 1978.

That since the initiation of this claim, the parties have engaged in extensive discovery and have entered into a joint stipulation.

This Court therefore finds that based upon the parties’ joint stipulation, the Claimant was injured when the bicycle uGon which he was riding fell into a waterfilled series of holes in the broken pavement of Route 41 just south of West Park Avenue in Highland Park, Illinois. That as a result of the fall from his bicycle, Claimant sustained a comminuted and displaced fracture of the [*135] olecranon process of his right elbow. His fracture required hospitalization and surgery at Highland Park Hospital, Highland Park, Illinois. The Court further finds that the Respondent had actual knowledge of the defective pavement in question for a period of at least six months and up to one year prior to June 8, 1978. (See Thien v. City of Belleuille, 331 Ill. App. 337; Di Orio v. State (1950), 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 53; Kamin v. State (1953), 21 Ill. Ct. C1.467.) The parties have further agreed that it is in their respective best interests to stipulate to these facts and to agree that the sum of six thousand ($6,000.00) dollars be awarded the Claimant to fairly and reasonably compensate him for the injuries he sustained resulting from the occurrence in question.

It is hereby ordered that the Court finds the parties' joint stipulation to be fair and just and that the sum of six thousand ($6,000.00)dollars be awarded to the Claimant, Robert Stein, in .full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause.

Official volume 36 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1984 – July 1, 1983–June 30, 1984)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.