Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Foretravel v. State of Illinois

36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 343 Illinois Court of Claims Filed June 4,1984 No. 84-CC-1754
Disposition: (No. 84-CC-1754-Claimant awarded $320.58.) Award: $320.58
Cite as: Foretravel v. State of Illinois, 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 343 (1984)
General Court of Claims 36 awarded 1980s Foretravel v. State of Illinois 36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 343 June 4,1984 (No. 84-CC-1754-Claimant awarded $320.58.) /opinions/v36-p0428-1/

FORETRAVEL, INC., Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant's property was damaged when a State employee backed a snowplow into it. The court accepted the parties' stipulation and awarded $320.58 in full satisfaction.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. STlPuLATIoNs-damage due to snowplow-claim allowed. Based on the joint stipulation of the parties, an award was granted to Claimant for the damage to property caused when a State employee backed a snowplow into the property, as the State admitted liability and both parties agreed that the amount of the award would constitute full and final satisfaction of the claim.

This cause coming before the Court upon the joint stipulation of the parties and the. Court being duly advised in the premises:

Finds, that the Claimant’s property was damaged when an employee of the State of Illinois backed a snowplow into it. The amount of the damages was $320.58. This information was supported by a motorist’s report of Illinois vehicle accident, and several affidavits.

Respondent concedes liability for the damage of this property to the extent agreed upon in the joint stipulation.

Both parties agreed that the damage to the property was $320.58. Both parties agree’ that this award would constitute full and final satisfaction of the claim herein or any other claim arising out of the same occurrence.

No other evidence oral or written was presented to the Court, and both parties waived briefs.

While the Court is not necessarily bound by a stipulation such as this, it has no desire to interpose a controversy where none appears to exist. The stipulation submitted by the parties appears to have been entered into freely and fairly, and its contents appear to be reasonable. The Court, therefore, finds no reason not to accept it and follow its recommendations for an award in the amount of $320.58.

It is hereby ordered, that the Claimant be awarded the amount of $320.58 in full and final satisfaction of the instant claim.

Official volume 36 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1984 – July 1, 1983–June 30, 1984)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.