Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

William Holland v. State of Illinois

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 257 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1984-07-27 No. 83-CC-2609
Disposition: (No. 83-CC-2609-Claimant awarded $4,558.45.) I Award: $4,558.45 Agency: Illinois Law Enforcement Commission
Cite as: William Holland v. State of Illinois, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 257 (1984)
General Court of Claims 37 awarded 1980s William Holland v. State of Illinois 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 257 1984-07-27 (No. 83-CC-2609-Claimant awarded $4,558.45.) I /opinions/v37-p0339-1/

WILLIAM HOLLAND, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, I Respondent. I

Case summary

Claimant sought a lump-sum payment of accrued vacation days after his agency was abolished and he transferred to a position subject to the Personnel Code. The court found his election was authorized by law and awarded $4,318.76 plus additional amounts from state and federal funds totaling $4,558.45.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 63b101 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 150a; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 166

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (ROBERT J. I
  2. SKLAMBERG, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for I Respondent. I STATE EMFWYEES’ BACK SALARY C w - a c c r u e d uacatfon-change of position-award granted. The Claimant elected to receive a lump-sum L
  3. settlement for his accrued vacation pay when he transferred from a position ~
  4. with the State that was not subject to the Personnel Code to a position subject to the Code, and an award was granted for the amount due based on I
  5. the stipulation of the State, since there were no funds in the line item I appropriations due to the abolition of the commission for which he previously worked, and the State was still obligated to pay since the Claimant’s election to receive a lump-sum settlement for the accrued I vacation pay was expressly authorized by the Personnel Code. I

This cause coming on to be heard on the stipulation of Respondent, due notice having been given the Claimant and the Court being fully advised in the premises. The Court finds: . That this claim is for salary due Claimant. The appropriations, by line items, out of which this would have been paid are as follows: 488-55201-1120-0000-83, 488-55201-1161-0000-83, and 488-55201-1170-0000-83.

Claimant is seeking a lump-sum payment of his accrued vacation days. He was the executive director of the Illinois Law Enforcement Commission at the time of its abolition by the legislature on March 31,1983. On that date Claimant had 24% accrued vacation days, or a monetary total of $4,318.76.

Claimant was then transferred to the Illinois Bureau of Employment Security on May 10, 1983. Thus, Claimant had transferred from a position not subject to the Personnel Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 63b101 et seq.) to a position subject to the Code.

At that time, Claimant sought a lump-sum payment of his accrued vacation days. He made this election in accordance with section 14(a) of the Personnel Code (Ill.

Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 150a), which provides that; " . . . upon the movement of a State employee . . . to a position subject to the Personnel Code from a State position not subject to the Personnel Code . . . his accrued vacation and overtime shall be either payable in a single lump sum .payment, or . . . credited to the employee's account. . .

It is thus apparent that Claimant's election to receive a lump-sum payment of accrued vacation days [*259] was in accordance with applicable law. However, he did not receive such payment because no funds existed in the line item appropriations due to the abolition of the Law Enforcement Commission.

We believe this matter is within the purview of section 30 of the Finance Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 127, par. 166), which prohibits a State commission from obligating the State in an amount in excess of the money appropriated, unless expressly authorized by law. We find that Claimant’s election to receive a lump-sum accrued vacation payment was expressly authorized by the Personnel Code, and that Respondent, therefore, remains obligated to pay Claimant’s accrued vacation days through March 31,1983.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded four thousand three hundred eighteen dollars and seventy-six cents ($4,318.76).

APPENDIX A (10%State general rev.)

Identification of State Contributions and Deductions from Back Salary Award.

To the State Employees’ Retirement System -. Employee’s contribution to State Employees’ Retirement System .oo Employee’s contribution to FICA .oo State’s contribution to State

Employees’ Retirement System 23.97

State’s contribution to FICA .oo To Illinois State Treasurer to be remitted to Internal Revenue Service: Claimant’s Federal income tax 86.38 [*260] To Illinois Department: Claimant’s Illinois income tax 15.12 To the Claimant:

Net Salary 330.38

Total award $455.85 APPENDIX A (90%Federal funds) Identification of State Contributions and Deductions from Back Salary Award.

To the State Employees’ Retirement System Employee’s contribution to State Employees’ Retirement System .oo Employee’s contribution to FICA .oo State’s contribution to State

Employees’ Retirement System 215.72

State’s contribution to FICA .oo To Illinois State Treasurer to be remitted to Internal Revenue Service: Claimant’s Federal income tax 777.37 8 . + To Illinois Department: Claimant’s Illinois income tax 136.04 To the Claimant:

Net Salary 2973.47

Total award $4102.60

Official volume 37 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1985 – July 1, 1984–June 30, 1985)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.