Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Jane M. Graham and Iowa Mutual Insurance Company v. State of Illinois

38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 125 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1985-09-20 No. 80-CC-1079
Disposition: (No. 80-CC-1079-Claimant awarded $3,976.00.) Award: $3,976.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Corrections
Cite as: Jane M. Graham and Iowa Mutual Insurance Company v. State of Illinois, 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 125 (1985)
General Court of Claims 38 awarded 1980s Jane M. Graham and Iowa Mutual Insurance Company v. State of Illinois 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 125 1985-09-20 (No. 80-CC-1079-Claimant awarded $3,976.00.) /opinions/v38-p0207-1/

JANE M. GRAHAM and IOWA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Claimants, 0.THE STATE OF‘ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought damages for a car collision caused by an escaping prisoner who was given keys to a state vehicle by prison employees. The court found the state liable due to employee negligence and awarded $3,976.00.

Claim type: Property Damage

Cases cited: Minor v. State (1972), 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 368

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PRISONERSAND INMATES-escape-guards negligent- automobile accident-award granted. Based on a stipulation of facts, the Claimant and her insurer were granted an award to cover the damages caused to Claimant’s automobile when an escaped inmate of a correctional center crashed the automobile he had stolen from the correctional center into Claimant’s car, since the facts established that guards at the center had negligently facilitated the inmate’s escape by giving him the keys to the vehicle he stole as part of an assignment directing him to clean the vehicle.

A stipulation of facts was filed in this case by the parties. The only issue is whether the Respondent is liable for damages caused by an escaping prisoner [*126]

126 I

I

where the State employees voluntarily gave the inmate the keys to an automobile at the prison and directed the ~

I

inmate to clean the automobile. I

I

The relevant facts of this case are as follows: On or about October 24, 1978, Joseph DeFoe was lawfully in ! ! the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections I and under its direction, supervision and control, under a sentence of 20 months’ periodic imprisonment. The prisoner was an inmate of the Joliet Community !

I

I

Correctional Center, a minimum security prison. Agents of the corrections center gave keys to a vehicle owned I by the State to Joseph DeFoe and directed the prisoner to clean the vehicle. The prisoner then fled from the :

I

corrections center in the automobile. While fleeing from i the center, the escapee crashed the automobile he had stolen from the correctional center into the car owned i by the Claimant, Jane M. Graham. The Claimant, Iowa j Mutual Insurance Company paid all but $100.00 of the I damages. i

I

It is settled law that the Respondent is liable to the Claimant in this case. I

I

In Minor v . State (1972), 27 Ill. Ct. C1.368, the court stated: I

I

“The escape was admittedly made possible by the negligence of I Respondent’s employees at this minimum security prison. Among other things, one of the three convicts was permitted to possess keys to an automobile at the prison. This car was used by the three inmates as a means I of transportation in escaping from the institution.”

The evidence clearly establishes that (1) a duty was owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and that there was a breach of such duty; and (2) an injury resulted 1 from the breach. I The Claimant sustained damages to her automobile , totaling $3,976.00 by reason of the collision with the I , i [*127] escapee in the State’s automobile and therefore should be awarded said $3,976.00.

It is therefore ordered, that Claimants Jane M. Graham and Iowa Mutual Insurance Company are awarded three thousand nine hundred seventy-six and 00/100 dollars ($3,976.00) as full and complete satisfaction of this claim.

Official volume 38 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1986 – July 1, 1985–June 30, 1986)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.