Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Crime Victim Compensation
Download PDF

In re Mary a. Smith

38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 439 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1986-06-20 No. 86-CV-0400
Disposition: (No. 86-CV-0400-Claimant awarded $1,825.00.) ' Award: $1,825.00
Cite as: In re Mary a. Smith, 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 439 (1986)
Crime Victim Compensation 38 awarded 1980s In re Mary a. Smith 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 439 1986-06-20 (No. 86-CV-0400-Claimant awarded $1,825.00.) ' /opinions/v38-p0521-1/

In re APPLICATION OF MARY A. SMITH.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for psychological counseling expenses after being sexually harassed and assaulted by a co-worker. The court awarded $1,825.00 after deducting $200.00 and applying proportional reductions to paid and unpaid expenses.

Claim type: Crime Victim Compensation

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 70, par. 71 et seq.; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, par. 12-1

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NEIL F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General (SALLIE MANLEY ,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for I Respondent.
  2. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION Am-deductions allowed from all claims. The amount of benefits, payments or awards payable under the ! Workers' Compensation Act, Dramshop Act, Federal Medicare, State Public Aid, Federal Social Security Administration burial benefits, Veterans Administration burial benefits, health insurance, or any other source, except I annuities, pension plans, Federal Social Security payments payable to dependents of the victim and net proceeds of first $25,OOO.00 of life, I insurance, and $200.00, except in case of victims 65 years of age or older, I1 must be deducted from all claims. SAME - ~ Wm ~ ~y ~beS made payable jointly to Claimant and provider of services. Section 18(c)of the Crime Victims Compensation Act allows the Court of Claims to order that a11 or a portion of an award be paid jointly to the applicant and provider of services (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 70, par. 88(c)).
  3. SAME-assault-medical and hospital erpenses-claim auowed-leave to reopen claim. Award for medical and hospital expenses allowed where Claimant was victim of fondling and sexual harassment by co-worker over seven-day period, and leave was granted to reopen claim for consideration of additional expenses for psychological counseling that may be incurred in future.

I

This claim arises out of incidents that occurred from September 18,1984, until September 24,1984. Mary A. Smith, Claimant, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act,

I

[*440] hereafter referred to as the Act. 111. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 70, par. 71 et seg.

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on October 1, 1985, on the form prescribed by the Attorney General, and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds: 1. That the Claimant, Mary A. Smith, age 24, was a victim of a violent crime, as defined in section 2(c) of the Act, to wit: assault. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, par. 12-1. 2. That beginning on September 18, 1984, until September 24, 1984, the Claimant was fondled and repeatedly sexually harassed by a co-worker. The incident occurred while the Claimant was working at a restaurant located at 7516 West Diversey, Elmwood Park, Illinois. As a result of the incident, the Claimant needed and received psychological counseling. The offender was apprehended, prosecuted and convicted of criminal sexual abuse. 3. That the Claimant seeks compensation for medical/hospital expenses only. The Claimant does not seek compensation for loss of earnings. 4. That the Claimant incurred psychological counseling expenses in the amount of $2,025.00, none of which was paid by insurance, leaving a balance of $2,025.00. To date, the Claimant has paid $100.00, towards this balance. 5. That the Claimant has complied with all pertinent provisions of the Act and qualifies for compensation thereunder.

[*441] 6. That pursuant to section lO.l(e) of the Act, this I Court must deduct $200.00 from all claims (except in the II case of an applicant 65’ years of age or older), and the amount of benefits, payments or awards payable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, Dramshop Act, I Federal Medicare, State Public Aid, Federal Social Security Administration burial benefits, Veterans Administration burial benefits, health insurance, or from any other source, except annuities, pension plans, Federal Social Security payments payable to dependents of the victim and the net proceeds of the first $25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand dollars) of life insurance that would inure to the benefit of the applicant . 7. That the Claimant has received no reimburse

I

ments that can be counted as applicable deductions. 8. That the Claimant has filed a civil action against the offender, Smith v . Comcho, No. 85 L 8295, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Law Division, as a result of the incident.

The Claimant, by informing the Attorney General of her pending civil suit, has acknowledged her responsibility to further notify the Attorney General of the final disposition of the civil action, pursuant to section 17 of the Act. 9. That the Claimant has indicated that she may incur additional counseling expenses as a result of the incident. Should the Claimant incur such additional expenses, she may petition the Court to reopen her claim for consideration of these expenses, pursuant to section 16 of the Act.

[*442] ’ 442 i 10. That pursuant to section 18(c) of the Act, the Court may order that all or a portion of an award be paid jointly to the applicant and provider of services. In the instant case, the Court finds this action applicable and orders that joint payment be made. 11. That after applying the applicable deductions, the Claimant’s loss for which she seeks compensation is $1,825.00, based upon the following:

Less %

Compensable of $200.00

Amount Deductible Total

Paid Psycho

therapy

Expenses $ 100.00 5.0% $ 90.00

Ner Littner,

M.D., S.C. 300.00 14.8% 270.40

Joan Collins

Thompson,

A.C.S.W. 1,625.00 80.2% 1,464.60

Total $2,025.00 100.0% $1,825.00

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $90.00 (ninety dollars) be and is hereby awarded to Mary A. Smith, an innocent victim of a violent crime.

It is further ordered that the sum of $270.40 (two hundred seventy dollars and forty cents) be and is hereby awarded to Mary A. Smith and Ner Littner, M.D., S.C. It is further ordered that the sum of $1,464.60 (one thousand four hundred sixty-four dollars and sixty cents) [*443] be and is hereby awarded to Mary A. Smith and Joan Collins Thompson, A.C.S.W.

Official volume 38 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1986 – July 1, 1985–June 30, 1986)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.