26, 1992, more than one year following the date (Dec. 4, 1990) of the payment-refusal notice in which IDPA had responded to Claimant’s initial invoice of charges for Ford’s September 12-16,1990 inpatient services. It is hereby ordered and adjudged: that Nos. 92 CC 3328 and 92 C C 3342 are dismissed as a result of Claimant’s failure to commence those two actions within the time prescribed by statute; and judgment on the pleadings as to all issues presented in Nos. 92 CC 3321 through 92 CC 3327 inclusive is entered against Claim- ant, St. Therese Medical Center, and in favor of Respon- dent, and said seven claims are also dismissed.
Case summary
The claimant sought payment for inpatient services provided to a patient. The court dismissed the claims because the actions were not commenced within the statutory time limit, and entered judgment on the pleadings against the claimant on the remaining claims.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
26, 1992, more than one year following the date (Dec. 4, 1990) of the payment-refusal notice in which IDPA had responded to Claimant’s initial invoice of charges for Ford’s September 12-16,1990 inpatient services.
It is hereby ordered and adjudged: that Nos. 92 CC 3328 and 92 C C 3342 are dismissed as a result of Claimant’s failure to commence those two actions within the time prescribed by statute; and judgment on the [*376] pleadings as to all issues presented in Nos. 92 CC 3321 through 92 CC 3327 inclusive is entered against Claimant, St. Therese Medical Center, and in favor of Respondent, and said seven claims are also dismissed.