Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Marilyn Griffin v. State of Illinois

75 Ill. Ct. Cl. 268 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 2023-03-24 No. 16-CC-1876
Disposition: (No. 16-CC-1876 - Claim Denied)
Cite as: Marilyn Griffin v. State of Illinois, 75 Ill. Ct. Cl. 268 (2023)
General Court of Claims 75 denied 2020s Marilyn Griffin v. State of Illinois 75 Ill. Ct. Cl. 268 2023-03-24 (No. 16-CC-1876 - Claim Denied) /opinions/v75-p0268-1/

MARILYN GRIFFIN, M.D., Claimant v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent

Case summary

Claimant filed a medical negligence claim. The court initially denied Respondent's motion to dismiss, but on reconsideration granted it because Claimant did not plead institutional negligence in her complaint, and the statute of limitations barred adding such a claim.

Claim type: Medical Malpractice

Cases cited: Tirado v. State, 13 CC 0452; Franklin v. Little Company of Mary Hospital, 2017 Ill. App 1st District 161585-U

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

ORDER

BIRNBAUM, C.J. The matter is before the Court to rule on Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider dated June 7, 2022, and Claimant’s Reply dated August 15, 2022. For the reasons set forth below, Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider is granted.

On March 7, 2022, we issued an Order denying Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. In rendering our decision we cited Tirado v. State, 13 CC 0452 and in so doing held that a claim for institutional negligence in the Court of Claims may survive an unsuccessful medical negligence claim against a health care professional in the Circuit Court.

In its Motion to Reconsider Respondent points out that the claimant in Tirado, pled institutional negligence in the case filed with the Court of Claims. That action was held on general continuance while a Circuit Court action was being litigated.

Respondent argues that unlike Tirado, the Claimant here did not plead institutional negligence in her claim with this Court. Respondent cites Franklin v. Little Company of Mary Hospital, 2017 Ill. App 1st District 161585-U. In that case, the Appellate Court ruled the relation back doctrine does not allow an institutional negligence claim to be added after the statute of limitations in an underlying negligence action had run.

We agree. In the instant case, there was no claim for institutional negligence claim in the complaint at bar.

Therefore, Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider is GRANTED and the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

It is so ordered.

Official volume 75 (Official Reports of the Illinois Court of Claims For: Fiscal Year 2023 – July 1, 2022–June 30, 2023)  ·  All opinions in this volume

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.