Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

A. R. Ransom v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-11 No. 1524
Disposition: (No. 1524-Claimant awarded $75.00.) Award: $75.00 Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: A. R. Ransom v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s A. R. Ransom v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523 1931-05-11 (No. 1524-Claimant awarded $75.00.) /opinions/v06-p0552-1/

A. R. RANSOM, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $180 for crop loss and inability to plant due to a destroyed drain line under the jurisdiction of the Division of Highways. The court recommended an award of $75, as suggested by the Attorney General.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when award will be made. Where it appears from OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim for the loss of crops on one and one-half acres of ground in the year 1929 and inability to plant 4 acres on the same farm land in 1929 as a result of a drain line being destroyed which was under the jurisdiction of the Division of Highways. The files in the case do not disclose very many facts upon which the court can consider the actual damage, but it appears that the District Engineer of Highways and the Attorney General's office are of the opinion that an allowance should be made. The claim is for $180.00 and the Attorney General suggests that $75.00 is a reasonable amount to allow.

Therefore the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of Seventy-five ($75.00) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.