Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s County of Whiteside v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 523 1931-05-11 (No. 1529-Claimant awarded $133.87.) /opinions/v06-p0552-2/ COUNTY OF WHITESIDE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The County of Whiteside claimed $280.93 for losses from destruction of tubercular cattle under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Acts. The court awarded $123.87, one-third of the claim, as the extent of state liability.
Claim type: Other
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- ANIMALS-when award will be made for losses sustained through the
ANIMALS-when award will be made for losses sustained through the destruction of certain tubercular cattle. Where there is no contention as to the claim coming within the law an award will be recommended for the State's share for losses sustained through the destruction of certain tubercular cattle under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Act. LLOYD H. BROWN, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; CARL I. DIETZ, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE CLANTY delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for relief under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Acts of 1919 and 1925 for loss sustained through the destruction of certain tubercular cattle owned by the County of Whiteside as a part of a dairy herd of the Whiteside County Home. The total claim is made in the sum of $280.93.
There appears to be no contention as to the claim coming within the law, although the State is liable for only one-third and the Attorney General comes and recommends an allowance of $123.87 to claimant, being one-third of the claim and would be the extent of the liability of the State of Illinois.
Therefore, this court recommends that claimant be allowed $123.87.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.