Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Harry L. McCasz v. Inirnors

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 Illinois Court of Claims Filed June 22, 1962 No. 5012
Disposition: (No. 5012-Claimant awarded $408.33.) Award: $408.33
Cite as: Harry L. McCasz v. Inirnors, 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 (1962)
Lapsed Appropriation 24 awarded 1960s Harry L. McCasz v. Inirnors 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 June 22, 1962 (No. 5012-Claimant awarded $408.33.) /opinions/v24-p0263-1/

Harry L. McCasz, Claimant, v. Srate or Inirnors, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. Persona Services-lapsed appropriation, Evidence showed that claimant was entitled to an award for services performed.

On December 6, 1961, Harry L. McCabe, Judge of the City Court of Harrisburg, Illinois, filed a complaint seeking an award for the balance due him for services rendered the State of Illinois as a sitting Judge in the Superior Court of Cook County.

A. stipulation filed discloses that Judge McCabe served in the Superior Court of Cook County from June 19, 1961 through June 23, 1961, and a second period from June 25, 1961 through June 30, 1961.

[*219] Exhibit A, attached to the complaint, is a statement from the office of the Auditor of Public Accounts, which discloses that there is a balance due Judge McCabe in the amount of $408.33.

The complaint alleges that, through inadvertence or mistake, only a portion of his statement was paid, which left a balance of $408.33 due him, after allowing all just credits.

The Court, after examining the pleadings and exhibits, finds that Judge McCabe performed the services in the Superior Court of Cook County, as set forth in the complaint, and that there is due him for such services the sum of $408.33.

An award is, therefore, made to complainant in the sum of $408.33.

Official volume 24 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: November 16, 1960–August 20, 1964)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.