Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Sancamo Construction Company v. Ixxiors

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 12, 1963 No. 5049
Disposition: (No. 5049-Claimant awarded $4,339.50 Award: $4,339.50
Cite as: Sancamo Construction Company v. Ixxiors, 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 (1963)
Lapsed Appropriation 24 awarded 1960s Sancamo Construction Company v. Ixxiors 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 414 November 12, 1963 (No. 5049-Claimant awarded $4,339.50 /opinions/v24-p0459-1/

Sancamo Construction Company, ADELAWARE Corporat ION, Claimant, v. Starr or Ixxiors, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. Contracrs-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Sangamo Construction Company, seeks recovery of $4,339.50 as the balance remaining on a contract for construction work at the Litchfield Armory at Litchfield, Illinois.

The parties have stipulated in part as follows:

. that Sangamo Construction Company, A Corporation, entered into a contract with the State of Illinois, acting through the Department of Public Works and Buildings on behalf of the Adjutant General, for the complete work for roads, walks, grading, etc., at the Litchfield Armory, Litchfield, Illinois, on June 30, 1961...

“. .. that all work done under said contract has now been completed, as is further shown by the report of the Military and Naval Department. . .

“”. , that total contract price was $30,540.00, of which a total of $26,190.50 has been paid by the State of Illinois, leaving an unpaid balance of $4,339.50, which is now due and owing pursuant to the contract.”

It appears from the record that the appropriation for the project lapsed June 30, 1961, and the project was not satisfactorily completed until April 26, 1963.

The Departmental Report of May 3, 1963 states that a final payment in the amount of $4,339.50 is justified.

The only reason for non-payment of this claim by respondent was lapse of the appropriation. At the time that the appropriation lapsed, there were sufficient unexpended funds available to cover the amount of this claim.

There being no question of law or fact in controversy, as reflected by the stipulation of the parties hereto, an award is hereby made to claimant in the sum of $4,339.50.

Official volume 24 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: November 16, 1960–August 20, 1964)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.