Jack Muss, Inc., Claimant, v. SraTE oF Ixurnots, Respondent.
Jack Muss, Inc., Claimant, vs. SraTE oF Ixurnots, Respondent.
Opinion filed February 28, 1964.
VANDEVER AND Vanpever, Attorneys for Claimant.
Wriam G. Crarx, Attorney General; C. Arnruur that the Ine., seeks recovery in the 5, as the balance remaining due on a its Department of Public Works and Buildings, Divi, acting by of Ar ire and Engineering, for mechanical work at Armory, Litchfield, Tlinois.
partner tal Report of the Military and Naval partment, to which the funds had been approp1 1 that claimant had completed the provisions of the [*438] contract, and inspection and approval had been made on April 26, 1963, ‘‘which now justifies final payment in the amount of $1,493.35.’? The Report, signed by Donald R. Grimmer, Assistant Adjutant General, also stated that the reason for nonpayment was that the contract was not completed by September 30, 1961, when the funds were lapsed and returned to the General Revenue Account.
Where a contract with the State has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. National Korectaire Co. vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 302, 305.
It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case. Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $1,493.35.