Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

James Lewiis v. State of Illinois

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 522 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 9, 1979 No. 74-CC-0620
Disposition: (No. 74-CC-0620-Claimant awarded $234.00.) Award: $234.00
Cite as: James Lewiis v. State of Illinois, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 522 (1979)
General Court of Claims 32 awarded 1970s James Lewiis v. State of Illinois 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 522 April 9, 1979 (No. 74-CC-0620-Claimant awarded $234.00.) /opinions/v32-p0629-1/

JAMES LEwiIs, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to exercise

JAMES LEwiIs, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed April 9, 1979.

CATHLEEN COHEN and JAN KELEHER, Attorneys for Claimant.

WILLIAM J. Scott, Attorney General; WILLIAM

WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

[*523] PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

Po.os, C.J. Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

Claimant demonstrated by preponderance of the evidence that during the course of a transfer from Cook County Jail to the Joliet Correctional Center, Claimant turned over to agents of the State of Illinois several items of personal property: including a gold wedding band, a silver ring, and a wrist watch, having a total value of $234.00. Claimant was told that the items would be shipped to his home address, but shortly thereafter the items were stolen from the office of the State employee.

It appears that the thieves who took the items were caught and are to be prosecuted, but the stolen property is still missing.

The Court finds that the State of Illinois took actual physical possession of Claimant’s property, and that a bailment relationship existed with respect to that property. The loss of property while in the possession of a bailee raises a prima facie case of negligence, and the State has failed to come forward with any evidence showing that it took due care in safeguarding that property.

[*524] It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and herebe is awarded the sum of $234.00.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.