Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Walter L. Scoccins v. State of Illinois

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 548 Illinois Court of Claims Filed February 1, 1979 No. 75-CC-0361
Disposition: (No. 75-CC-0361-Claimant awarded $80.00.) Award: $80.00
Cite as: Walter L. Scoccins v. State of Illinois, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 548 (1979)
General Court of Claims 32 awarded 1970s Walter L. Scoccins v. State of Illinois 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 548 February 1, 1979 (No. 75-CC-0361-Claimant awarded $80.00.) /opinions/v32-p0655-1/

WALTER L. Scoccins, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to exercise

WALTER L. Scoccins, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed February 1, 1979.

PRISONERS AND INMATES-Bailments. State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

Po.os, C. J. Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated.

On March 13, 1974, Claimant was transferred from the Menard Correctional Center to the Joliet Correctional Center. During this transfer, some of Claimant’s personal property was lost through no fault of his own, including one Panasonic Radio valued at $20.00. Upon his return to Menard Correctional Center on April 30, 1974, a Norelco electric shaver valued at $20.00 was lost through no fault of Claimant.

In addition, Claimant has established that four [*549] personal photographs, which he valued at $10.00 each, were lost while in the possession of the Department of Corrections.

This Court has often held that the State of Illinois holds the duty to use reasonable care in safeguarding the property of inmate’s, when that property is placed in its possession as a bailee. Claimant has established that the foregoing items of property were in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois when they were lost. A presumption therefore arises that Respondent was negligent in maintaining Claimant’s property, and Respondent has come forward with no evidence to rebut that presumption.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $80.00.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.