Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Ryc & Staahly Implements v. Nois

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 937 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 18, 1979 No. 78-CC-2266
Disposition: (No. 78-CC-2266 - Claimant awarded $905.88.) Award: $905.88
Cite as: Ryc & Staahly Implements v. Nois, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 937 (1979)

Ryc & STaAHLY IMPLEMENTS, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. Ryc & STaAHLY IMPLEMENTS, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLI-

This cause is before the Court on the motion of Respondent to withdraw a motion to dismiss heretoli | | fore filed. In support of its motion, Respondent states that the motion to dismiss was filed through inadvertance, and that a departmental report received from the Department of Conservation shows that the claim herein should be allowed. As departmental reports are prima facie evidence of the matter set forth therein, the Court finds that there is no disputed issue of material fact, and that Claimant is entitled to judgment. It is therefore ordered that Respondent be, and hereby is, granted leave to withdraw its motion to dismiss. It is further ordered that Claimant be, and hereby awarded the sum of $905.88 in full satisfaction of its claim.

Ryc & STaAHLY IMPLEMENTS, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Order filed April 18, 1979.

This cause is before the Court on the motion of Respondent to withdraw a motion to dismiss [*938] heretoli | | fore filed. In support of its motion, Respondent states that the motion to dismiss was filed through inadvertance, and that a departmental report received from the Department of Conservation shows that the claim herein should be allowed.

As departmental reports are prima facie evidence of the matter set forth therein, the Court finds that there is no disputed issue of material fact, and that Claimant is entitled to judgment.

It is therefore ordered that Respondent be, and hereby is, granted leave to withdraw its motion to dismiss.

It is further ordered that Claimant be, and hereby awarded the sum of $905.88 in full satisfaction of its claim.

Official volume 32 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1978 – July 1, 1977–June 30, 1978; Fiscal Year 1979 – July 1, 1978 – June 30, 1979)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.