Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Blossom Levine v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 836 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1982-07-15 No. 82-CC-0496
Disposition: (No. 82-CC-0496-Claimant awarded $900.00.) Award: $900.00 Agency: Northeastern Illinois University
Cite as: Blossom Levine v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 836 (1982)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Blossom Levine v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 836 1982-07-15 (No. 82-CC-0496-Claimant awarded $900.00.) /opinions/v35-p0992-1/

BLOSSOM LEVINE,Claimant, u. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages after an erroneous insurance form eliminated her dependent spouse life insurance, preventing collection upon her husband's death. The court awarded $900.00 per joint stipulation.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. T YRONE C. FAHNER, Attorney General (GLEN P. LARNER,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. STuwLAmoNs-error on insurance form-award granted. Where State conceded that it made error in filling out insurance form for Claimant, employee of State university, with rewlt that dependent spouse life insurance was eliminated as to Claimant’s husband, and Claimant did not become aware of error until her husband died and she was unable to collect insurance, award was granted Claimant based on joint stipulation of parties.

This claim comes before the Court upon the joint stipulation submitted by the parties. The stipulation states as follows:

1. That Claimant began working for Northeastern Illinois University on June 15, 1975.

2. That shortly thereafter, she enrolled in the Illinois [*837] State employees group insurance program and applied for dependent spouse life insurance.

3. That she retained and paid for this coverage until July 18, 1978, at which date Claimant and the other employees at Northeastern were asked to fill out new insurance forms.

4. That since Claimant was unusually busy at this time, she signed a blank form and asked the personnel director to fill it out so as to retain the coverage she already had, including dependent spouse life insurance.

5. That the personnel director erroneously filled out the form so as to eliminate the dependent spouse life insurance.

6. That Claimant did not become aware of the mistake and the change in coverage until March 19, 1980, when her husband died and she was unable to collect any insurance.

7. That Respondent concedes that it made an error on the insurance form and that it is liable to Claimant to the extent set forth herein.

8. That both parties agree that Claimant’s damages amount to $900.00 and that award in this amount be granted. I

9. That both parties agree that this award shall constitute full and final satisfaction of this claim or any others arising from the same occurrence.

10. That both parties waive hearing and the filing of briefs for this claim.

It appears to the Court that this stipulation was entered into freely and with due consideration of the law and facts relating to the claim. While we are not bound by this stipulation, we are also not disposed to create a [*838] controversy between the parties where none seems to otherwise exist.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $900.00 (nine hundred dollars and no cents) in full and final satisfaction of this claim.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.