Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Joseph R. Connolly v. State of Illinois

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 838 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1983-01-03 No. 82-CC-0792
Disposition: (No. 82-CC-0792-Clainiant awarded $2,500.00.) Award: $2,500.00
Cite as: Joseph R. Connolly v. State of Illinois, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 838 (1983)
General Court of Claims 35 awarded 1980s Joseph R. Connolly v. State of Illinois 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 838 1983-01-03 (No. 82-CC-0792-Clainiant awarded $2,500.00.) /opinions/v35-p0994-1/

JOSEPH R. CONNOLLY, Claimant, 0.THE STATE OFI LLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a settlement for an unspecified claim. The court ordered a settlement of $2,500.00 in favor of the claimant without a finding of State liability, based on a joint stipulation.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TYRONE C. F AHNER , Attorney General (P AUL M. SENGPIEHL, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.
  2. STipuLAnoNs-settlement without finding State liable. Award granted Claimant based on joint stipulation of parties allowing settlement in amount of $2,500 without finding of State liahility.

This matter comes before the Court upon the joint stipulation of Claimant and Respondent to the granting ' of a settlement in the amount of $2,500.00 without a finding of State liability. The Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, therefore, It is hereby ordered that a settlement amount be entered in favor of Claimant, Joseph R. Connolly, in the amount of $2,500.00 (twenty five hundred dollars) in full and final satisfaction of this matter.

Official volume 35 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion for: Fiscal Year 1982 – July 1, 1981–June 30, 1982; Fiscal Year 1983 – July 1, 1982 – June 30, 1983)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.